1. News & Issues

Discuss in my forum

What Is the Eurozone Crisis?

By , About.com Guide

What Is the Eurozone Crisis?

The Greece debt crisis put the future of the euro itself at risk.

Photo Credit: Jasper Juinen/Getty Images
The eurozone crisis was the world's greatest economic threat in 2011, according to the OECD. The crisis has festered since 2009, when the world first realized Greece could default on its debt. In two years, it escalated into the potential for sovereign debt defaults from Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain.

The European Union, led by Germany and France, struggled to support these members with bailouts from the ECB (European Central Bank) and IMF (International Monetary Fund). However, before it was all over the crisis threatened the concept and existence of the euro itself.

How the Eurozone Crisis Would Affect You:

If Greece, Italy or other eurozone countries defaulted on their debt, it would be much worse than the 2008 financial crisis for several reasons. Banks, the primary holders of sovereign debt, would face huge losses with smaller banks collapsing. In a panic, they'd cut back on lending to each other, and the LIBOR rate would skyrocket like it did in 2008.

Even worse, the European Central Bank (ECB) holds a lot of sovereign debt, so its future would be at risk. Without a central bank to bail its members out, the EU itself might not survive. Left unchecked, the rippling effect of uncontrolled sovereign debt defaults could create a recession, if not a global depression.

It would also be worse than the 1998 sovereign debt crisis. When Russia defaulted, other emerging market countries did too. However, the IMF stepped in, backed by the power of European countries and the U.S. This time, it's not the emerging markets, but the developed markets that are in danger of default. The major backers of the IMF -- Germany, France and the U.S. -- are themselves highly indebted. There would be little political appetite to add to that debt to fund the massive bailouts needed. If sovereign debt defaults were left unchecked, the resulting panic could cause a shutdown of credit, in which even the United States might have trouble funding its debt.

What Was the Proposed Solution?:

On December 8, 2011, the EU leaders agreed to a new inter-governmental treaty that would create a fiscal unity parallel to the monetary union that already exists. It would be finalized in March 2012 and then approved by all EU members. The treaty was designed to enforce the budget restrictions of the Maastricht Treaty, reassure lenders that the EU would stand behind its members' sovereign debt, and allow the EU to act as a more integrated unit. Specifically, the treaty would create five changes:
  1. Eurozone member countries would legally give some power over their budgets to centralized EU control.
  2. Members that exceeded the 3% deficit-to-GDP ratio would face financial sanctions. Any plans to issue sovereign debt must be reported in advance.
  3. The European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) would be replaced by a permanent bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). The phaseout would begin in 2012 and take about a year. The permanent fund assures lenders that the EU would fully stand behind its members, substantially lowering the risk of default.
  4. Voting rules in the ESM would allow emergency decisions to be passed with an 85% qualified majority. This would allow the EU to act more quickly.
  5. Eurozone countries would lend another €200 billion to the IMF from their central banks.

What Are the Consequences?:

Initially, the UK and several other EU countries that aren't part of the eurozone balked at the treaty. If the treaty is ratified by only eurozone countries, it could lead to a "two-tier" EU. Eurozone countries may then create preferential treaties for their members only, excluding EU countries that don't have the euro.

Second, eurozone countries must agree to cutbacks in spending. This could slow their economic growth, as it has in Greece. These austerity measures would be politically unpopular. Voter could bring in new leaders, who might leave the eurozone or the EU itself.

Third, a new form of financing -- the eurobond -- becomes available. The ESM would be funded by €700 billion in euro bonds, fully guaranteed by the eurozone countries. Like U.S. Treasuries, these bonds could be bought and sold on a secondary market. By competing with Treasuries, the eurobonds could lead to higher interest rates in the U.S. (Source: CNN, Will new deal solve Europe's problems?, December 9, 2011)

Why the Deal Wasn't Enough:

Debt ratings agencies like Standard & Poor's and Moody's want the ECB to step up and guarantee all eurozone members' debts. But EU leader Germany opposes such a move without assurances that debtor countries will install the austerity measures needed to put their fiscal houses in order. Germany does not want to write a blank euro check just to reassure investors. It is also paranoid about potential inflation, remembering only too well the hyperinflation of the 1920s.

In addition, investors worry that austerity measures, needed in the long run, will only slow the economic rebound debtor countries need to repay their debts. (Source: CNBC, "S&P Says Eurozone May Need Another Shock",Euro Crisis Pits Germany and U.S. in Tactical Fight, December 12, 2011)

How Did the Eurozone Get Into This Crisis?:

First, there were no penalties for countries that violated the debt-to-GDP ratios set by the EU's founding Maastricht Criteria. Why not? France and Germany also were spending above the limit. They'd be hypocritical to sanction others until they got their own houses in order. There were no teeth in any sanctions except expulsion from the eurozone, which would weaken the power of the euro itself. The EU wanted to strengthen the euro's power, putting pressure on non-eurozone EU members, like the UK, Denmark and Sweden, to adopt it. (Source: BBC News, Greece Joins Eurozone, January 1, 2001; Greece to Join Euro, June 1, 2000).

Second, eurozone countries initially benefited from the low interest rates and increased investment capital made possible by the euro's power. Most of this flow of capital was from Germany and France to the southern nations. This increased liquidity raised wages and prices, making their exports less competitive. Because they were on the euro, they couldn't do what most countries do to cool inflation -- raise interest rates or print less currency. Public spending rose, while tax revenues fell, during the recession to pay for unemployment and other benefits. (Source: Financial Times, Paul Krugman, Is Austerity Killing the Euro?)

Third, although there are good arguments for austerity measures, they might only slow economic growth by being too restrictive. For example, the OECD said austerity measures would make Greece more competitive by improving its public finance management and reporting, cutbacks on public employee pensions and wages, and lowering its trade barriers. In fact, exports have risen. More important, the OECD said Greece needed to crack down on tax dodgers, and sell off state-owned businesses, to raise funds. (Source: OECD, Economic Survey of Greece 2011)

In return for austerity measures, Greece's debt has been cut in half. However, these measures have also slowed the Greek economy by raising unemployment, cutting back consumer spending, and reducing capital needed for lending. Greece may never grow its way out of its debt.

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.