1. News & Issues
Kimberly Amadeo

Romney and Ryan's Proposed Path to Prosperity

By August 13, 2012

Follow me on:

Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney named House Representative Paul Ryan as his running mate on Sunday. This is good, because Ryan has specific proposals for the budget that can be evaluated. Romney's plans are clear on direction, but a little weak on details.

So, how would Ryan's  Fiscal Year 2013 Budget, titled the Path to Prosperity, affect the economy? First, it would  cut $5 trillion over the next decade, and that's a good thing. The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is already at 100%, and rising. Unfortunately, Paul's plan doesn't begin to balance the budget for another 20 years -- not soon enough to address the nation's debt ceiling crisis.

Furthermore, many of Ryan's budget cuts include reducing health care benefits to future Medicare recipients, to the poor and to Federal workers. This could increase the number of bankruptcies, half of which are caused by health care costs. (For more, see Why Reform Health Care)

Under Ryan's plan, seniors would receive Federal vouchers to buy their own health insurance. However, the Congressional Budget Office found that most of them would end up paying more than they do now. The plan only affects those who turn 65 in 2023 or later, the savings (and the pain) are postponed until then.

Ryan also proposes eliminating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and replacing them with a private funding source. Both Treasury Secretaries Paulson and Geithner tried the same thing, and the banks won't go for it. Fannie and Freddie, for all their faults, provide the government insurance banks are now requiring to accept mortgages. Take that away, and the vulnerable housing recovery will wither.

Ryan's budget follows the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan in many areas, such as Social Security and tax reform. These proposals have the best chance to pass, since they came from the bi-partisan commission. Although it wasn't approved at the time, many in Congress realize the Simpson-Bowles plan may be the only preventative that will keep us from falling off the fiscal cliff.

Everyone agrees that deficit reduction is necessary. It will strengthen the U.S. dollar, keeping imports affordable, lowering the trade deficit and reducing the threat of inflation. However, no one agrees on the best way to do that. The Simpson-Bowles plan should be reviewed and used as a starting place.

Related Articles



August 14, 2012 at 11:56 am
(1) Michael G Angstreich says:

An easily comprehended review and much appreciated, Thanks!

August 14, 2012 at 4:54 pm
(2) Barry W. Shook says:

“Romney’s plans…a little weak on details.” I’m no fan of Obama; and I’m a Republican. My greatest concern with Romney is the consistent lack of details in HOW he plans to accomplish WHAT he claims he’ll accomplish. All promise, and no detail.

August 15, 2012 at 4:54 pm
(3) useconomy says:

Thanks, Michael!

Barry, I agree. I’m surprised that Romney hasn’t come up with something more concrete by now. He even said that he’s going to come up with his own budget, not necessarily use Ryans’. I doubt he’ll do that, though — if he goes against Ryan’s budget, that’s like admitting it’s too conservative. Romney is trying to solidify his support among conservatives and the Tea Party, but hasn’t offered much to the all-important Independents and undecideds.

People need facts to make logical decisions.


August 16, 2012 at 3:51 pm
(4) Roger says:

we have heard like this many times from so many ex presidents and not much so result oriented except during clinton era.It looks like no body has any clue what is going on in USA.A whole lot of confused people in USA. with this high crime rate the economy will still go down Kim.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.